A few weeks ago I sent an email to Twin Falls City Council candidates with several questions.
Here is the response I received from Nathan Murray. I’m Thankful for his reply and hope it will assist you in preparing to vote on Tuesday, November 4, 2025.
1. How long have you lived in Twin Falls?
I moved to Twin Falls in 2016 after growing up in Boise. I came here for work and have built both my career and family here.
2. What do you like most about living in Twin Falls?
I love the sense of community and that people here care for one another. We do a good job of blending small-town relationships with the energy of a growing regional center.
3. What needs the most attention from the City Council in our beloved city?
Managing growth responsibly. We’re seeing a lot of change in housing, infrastructure, and traffic. The Council’s role is to help plan ahead so growth strengthens rather than strains what makes Twin Falls great.
4. What do you think is the most important long-term issue facing the city of Twin Falls?
Preparing our infrastructure and economy for sustained growth. This means smart planning, reliable utilities, and keeping Twin Falls affordable for families and businesses.
5. Is affordable housing a government issue or a private sector issue?
It’s both. The private sector builds homes, but city policy, zoning, infrastructure, and permitting set the framework that makes housing attainable. Partnership is the key.
6. What is your position on a local option sales tax for a city like Twin Falls?
I’m open to thoughtful discussion, but any local tax should be clearly tied to voter approved projects with transparent reporting. The public has to see where every dollar goes.
7. Are there reasons you could see where it would be better to turn down federal aid for city projects? Give some examples.
If the funding adds long-term obligations the city can’t sustain, or when it comes with conditions that don’t fit local needs, we should say no. Responsible stewardship sometimes means walking away from “free” money.
8. How could a city provide both safety for minors and liberty for adults related to events that promote immoral lifestyles? (ie: LGBTQ+ parades, events in public spaces, and promotion in the children’s department of the library)
The Constitution protects free expression, and the city must uphold that. At the same time, we can encourage event organizers and public institutions to be thoughtful about age-appropriate material and programs. My goal is a community that treats everyone with respect while empowering parents to guide their children’s experiences.
9. (Related to a COVID-type scenario) If put in the position of voting for or against a mask mandate-type policy in the city, would you be in favor or against? What criteria would you want to have in place before you would vote for such a policy?
Public health decisions should rely on clear data, consultation with medical experts, and transparency with the public. I favor voluntary compliance and education first. A mandate would need strong local evidence that it’s necessary and effective.
No Comments